<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Reserve study finds that home loan modification is not profitable. No! Really?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2009/07/08/study-finds-that-home-loan-modification-is-not-profitable-no-really/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2009/07/08/study-finds-that-home-loan-modification-is-not-profitable-no-really/</link>
	<description>Attempts at a Sustainable Lifestyle...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:47:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2009/07/08/study-finds-that-home-loan-modification-is-not-profitable-no-really/comment-page-1/#comment-3396</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2009/07/08/study-finds-that-home-loan-modification-is-not-profitable-no-really/#comment-3396</guid>
		<description>Hi

The problem will all of these sorts of schemes is twofold:

1.  It encourages (or at least doesn&#039;t discourage) delinquent behavior of both banks and debtors.

2.  The fairness issue - those that have been sensible are not helped.

The only reason to ignore these issues and continue is if there is a clear and substantial economic benefit to doing so (something that might indirectly benefit the majority through either higher house prices or improved emplyment prospects for example).  I think you make the valid point that it is not clear that this benefit exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>The problem will all of these sorts of schemes is twofold:</p>
<p>1.  It encourages (or at least doesn&#8217;t discourage) delinquent behavior of both banks and debtors.</p>
<p>2.  The fairness issue &#8211; those that have been sensible are not helped.</p>
<p>The only reason to ignore these issues and continue is if there is a clear and substantial economic benefit to doing so (something that might indirectly benefit the majority through either higher house prices or improved emplyment prospects for example).  I think you make the valid point that it is not clear that this benefit exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
