Racism, sexism, and elitism – My thoughts on the 2008 election soap opera

As a tax paying permanent resident of the United States with no right to vote, I am watching this election with a lot of disgust and a little bit of amusement. I think this election is really turning into a giant soap opera and I’m not sure how it will turn out, but the prevailing themes have been racism, sexism, and elitism. These are my opinions on what I have seen so far. Feel free to stop reading if you are not interested in my political commentary.

Now on the issue of racism, I’m pretty sick of hearing the rhetoric that if you don’t like Obama you are a racist. I was also pretty sickened by the fact that Obama and the democrats attempted to draw parallels between Obama and Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights Movement. Historically, the Democratic party was the party of the slave owners and the Republican party was formed in opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Act which would have expanded slavery into Kansas and expanded the power of the slave owners. Eventually, Abraham Lincoln became the first Republican president and the slaves were freed. During the Civil Rights Movement, the democrats were mostly against the desegregation and civil rights laws. It was Republicans who pushed through the The Civil Rights Act of 1964, a key piece of legislation that outlawed segregation and also created equal employment opportunities for women. One of the Democrats who voted against the Act is Senator Robert Byrd of West Virgina and he is still in office at the age of 91. He is a former member of the Ku Klux Klan and said the following in a letter, “I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side… Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.” He now says that he made a mistake by joining the Ku Klux Klan and endorses Barack Obama. He may be reformed, but it doesn’t change the fact that he supported racism for decades and the democrats have pursued racist agendas for hundreds of years. In a way, I feel that the Democrats are simply using Obama as a tool in the current moment. They are attempting to shed their racist past by using Obama as a symbol of change and I think it definitely worked. Apparently many people now believe that Republicans are the intolerant and racist party because they do not say nice things about Obama. I think that is pretty hypocritical because I am sure many of those old Democrats have nothing nice to say about Obama in their private letters.

The next big theme of this election is sexism. The hatred poured out against Hillary Clinton has pretty much divided the Democrats. There are allegations of caucus fraud by the Obama campaign and one female Clinton-supporting statistician has compiled a 98 page book about what happened during the caucuses. There are a lot of stories of fraud and intimidation conducted by the Obama campaign. The most serious and comical group that sprang out of the Hillary bashing by the Democrats is P.U.M.A, which stands for Party Unity My Ass. They are really serious about supporting Hillary, and there are hundreds of groups of these democrats who believe that the proverbial “old boys club” have shunned their candidate Hillary. Now McCain has picked Sarah Palin in response to the treatment Hillary received. I think it was a brilliant move even though Sarah Palin is the polar opposite of Hillary Clinton on pretty much every issue. Is Palin being used as a gimmick? I believe so, but the response of the Republican party towards Sarah Palin has been extremely enthusiastic, and in a way they are using the sexism of the Democrats against them. So far, the more liberal media has bashed Palin for having kids and having a high powered career at the same time. And just today I read a ridiculous comment by South Carolina Democratic chairwoman Carol Fowler that said Palin’s “primary qualification seems to be that she hasn’t had an abortion.” The funny thing about all of this is that the more they trash Sarah Palin, the more backlash they will receive. There are so many women in America that juggle being a mom and having a career, and I think when the media and rabid Democrats make comments that insinuate Palin isn’t qualified to do her job because she is a mom of five, they are inherently insulting many working woman across the nation.

The final -ism of the election is elitism. In the last election the Republicans painted John Kerry as an elitist that lived in a giant mansion with his ketchup heiress wife, and Kerry lost. This time, it is McCain who has the heiress wife and 8 or 10 homes, but somehow Obama is still more elitist. From where I am standing, both McCain and Obama are pretty far removed from the average American. However, Obama seems more elitist because he is a well spoken and well educated black man and Rev. Jesse Jackson actually said that Obama “talks down to black people” and that he wanted to “cut his nuts off”. Obama did make a lot of critical comments about the African American community including “I don’t know who taught them that reading and writing and conjugating your verbs was acting white, we’ve got to get over that mentality.” With these comments, it’s understandable that some people feel that Obama is elitist, but I think Obama is just being himself and being honest. Technically, you want to have the more educated and wise people in public office, but being humble and likable is also very important because the common man and woman do the voting. So in a way it makes sense that elitism is an undesirable trait, but I don’t think Obama or McCain should act dumb or poor just to be more likable. They are who they are, and there is nothing wrong with being well educated and wealthy as long as they govern with integrity and wisdom.

In the 16 years I have lived in America, it seems that Americans rarely vote on the important issues such as the economy and healthcare. Most of the time we have a personality contest filled with personal attacks. This election is definitely the most heated and divisive election I have seen thus far. It is also by far the most entertaining. I think whatever happens, this election will start a grand social experiment. We will either have the first African American president or the first female Vice President. As demonstrated by this election, racism and sexism are still alive and well in America and if either Palin or Obama fails miserably in their administration they could set back the group they represent. No matter what happens, I just hope things do not get worse than they already are. As the Chinese proverb says, “It’s better to be a dog in a peaceful time than be a human in a chaotic world”.

Related Posts

About

Wise Bread book is out! Enter the contest to win a new Flip.

15 Instructables for Saving Money and the Planet

Will there be a federal bailout for California?

Leaving San Mateo

10 comments ↓

#1 patricia on 09.11.08 at 3:02 pm

After reading this I believe your disgust and amusement are reserved mostly for the “liberal media” and “rabid democrats” and this surprises and disappoints me having lurked here for a while and generally been very impressed with your postings.

Note that anyone can find a situation or an example to back-up their views:
Racism: Strom Thurmond yes originally a Democrat but split from the party over federal intervention in segregation. Sooo many quotes/ instance of racism with this man. I choose this one that closely matches your Quote: “I wanna tell you, ladies and gentlemen, that there’s not enough troops in the army to force the Southern people to break down segregation and admit the nigra race into our theaters, into our swimming pools, into our homes, and into our churches.”

Republican Rep. Lynn Westmoreland “”Just from what little I’ve seen of her and Mr. Obama, Sen. Obama, they’re a member of an elitist-class individual that thinks that they’re uppity”. Any one who knows the African American history in the US know that “Uppity” is historically a racist term when used to describe African Americans AND especially a Rep. from Georgia would know that.

Sexism: Still haven’t found a single posting where the Democrats or Liberal Media have bashed Palen for having kids and being Governor. So far the only “bashing” I’ve heard regarding this is Republican representatives accusing the liberal media of bashing Palin for having kids and being Governor. And I have yet to find mention that Palin is unable to do the job because she is a mother only that she has no experience that would qualify her to be second in command of the US.

I agree that this soap opera is disgusting but I think where we differ is I believe each side is equally guilty and disgusting.

#2 admin on 09.11.08 at 4:16 pm

Well, the racism of the Democrats that I am writing about is more systemic and long standing than just one or two individuals. I didn’t even add that the Democrats were behind the Ku Klux Klan and murdered black politicians in the south. Also, you can see my link to a blog post that compiled the criticisms Palin received for having young children.

#3 admin on 09.11.08 at 4:19 pm

Here’s a pretty recent article questioning Palin’s ability to do her job because of her kids: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122028634965987529.html?mod=Letters

#4 Everything You Ever Wanted to Know 9/12/08 on 09.11.08 at 9:15 pm

[...] Racism, sexism, elitism – America’s political race at its best. [...]

#5 karma on 09.11.08 at 9:23 pm

I tend to agree with Patricia that your commentary is very one-sided. As a reputed outsider I would think that unbiased opinion of the American election process would be worth consideration. However, your commentary is anything but unbiased. There are more important issues such as the economy, war and future relations with other countries that should be considered. I do not see how debating history and whether a woman can have baby and a job is of primary importance to the future of the country.

#6 adminf on 09.11.08 at 9:28 pm

Hmm.. I have always freely admitted that I am biased. I actually wrote that I am biased in my About page ever since I started this blog. This is after all a personal blog with a collection of my opinions on various topics. You are right in saying that you “do not see how debating history and whether a woman can have baby and a job is of primary importance to the future of the country”, but that’s exactly what’s happening in this election and other American elections. The less important things come to the forefront, and that’s exactly what I am pointing out.

#7 Linsey on 09.12.08 at 9:54 am

Actually… if you’ve been reading this blog for awhile, then you probably ALREADY know that it’s biased.. (or at least opinionated.) She blogs on the Bible, for Pete’s sake! If you’ve stayed with her this long, then you really shouldn’t be surprised.

In defense of Baglady, she blogs other places and has the professionalism to keep her political leanings out of those posts. This is HER blog, however, and she can blog what she pleases.

I, for one, am happy to read it. I’m not surprised, as I’ve met Baglady, and it’s pretty consistent with what I would expect her views to be. I’m glad she posted it here on her own blog, where readers can take it (as I have) or leave it. I’m sick of all the political slant making it’s way into people’s non-personal blogs, when you least expect it, and being as venomous as can be. Some of my favorite professional contacts have taken to Twittering really nasty bits about Palin, and personally, it turns me off from wanting to do business with them.

To each their own. Do it respectfully, and we should have no qualms.

#8 Patricia on 09.12.08 at 1:47 pm

I find your analysis right on the mark and thorough. Although I am a moderate, I am aghast at the attacks on Palin and the overall general nastiness of this campaign. By the way, I am a different Patricia than the first Patricia who commented.

#9 BW on 09.14.08 at 8:13 am

I am so thankful that I haven’t bothered to hook up my TV since I moved to my new place. I’ve heard the political ads this year are terrible, maybe even worse than 2004.

#10 Kirk on 09.16.08 at 1:23 pm

Well, the attacks about this posting are ALL Leftist driven…no surprise there…the Left WILL call you out instantly if you oppose, on ANY grounds or on ANY merit, ANYONE they support…no exception…it is an old COMMUNIST tactic designed to shut down opposition…only problem for them is that Americans are getting fed up with the Leftist BS the mainstream media spouts daily…I’m not saying that the McCain campaign hasn’t used any dirty tactics, all politicians and campaigns do…what I am saying is that OBAMA is no saint, no messiah, and nothing more than a run-of-the-mill big-government Democrat, and his skin color is only being used by HIS party as a weapon…if something is said about him, as the owner of this blog pointed out, then it MUST be racist…BS…and about the elitist thing…it’s about trash-talking about folks…the guns and religion comment (which said behind closed doors to attract a certain fund-raising set makes them no less disparaging)…those of us in “fly-over” country do pay attention…good luck Demos, you will need it!

Leave a Comment

  • Entrecard

    Your ad could be here, right now.

  • Recommended Products

  • Archives

  • Recent Comments

  • pfblogs.org logo

    View blog authority

    Add to Technorati Favorites

    finding & comparing 0% Credit Cards can be hard but this website can help you