<%3Fxml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"%3F> Is viagra over the counter in canada » Cialis Viagra Levitra Pills Without Prescription.

]]> Is viagra over the counter in canada » Cialis Viagra Levitra Pills Without Prescription. http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2008/03/29/this-weeks-infuriating-and-odd-business-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1471 Pete Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:21:04 +0000 http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2008/03/29/this-weeks-infuriating-and-odd-business-news/#comment-1471 I say boo to the lawyers as well - i'm not sure i have any huge problem with what walmart did - ill advised? Yes. Illegal? no. Walmart will be taking a huge beating in the press because of this -but i think the real criminals are those lawyers who took so much of the settlement. I say boo to the lawyers as well – i’m not sure i have any huge problem with what walmart did – ill advised? Yes. Illegal? no. Walmart will be taking a huge beating in the press because of this -but i think the real criminals are those lawyers who took so much of the settlement.

]]>
Is viagra over the counter in canada » Cialis Viagra Levitra Pills Without Prescription. http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2008/03/29/this-weeks-infuriating-and-odd-business-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1470 Meg Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:50:23 +0000 http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2008/03/29/this-weeks-infuriating-and-odd-business-news/#comment-1470 Oh God, can we please quit pretending that just because Wal-Mart is big and everyone analyzes their every move that they are any different than any other company - big or small? In fact they have to be much more environmentally friendly and have better benefits and be more "caring" than most companies because they are so in the public eye. And for heaven's sake, being "a billion dollar company" doesn't mean squat, positive or negative. Billions in revenue means billions in expenses. I am so tired of people referring to "billion dollar companies" like they owe us something extra simply for being big. Oh God, can we please quit pretending that just because Wal-Mart is big and everyone analyzes their every move that they are any different than any other company – big or small? In fact they have to be much more environmentally friendly and have better benefits and be more “caring” than most companies because they are so in the public eye.

And for heaven’s sake, being “a billion dollar company” doesn’t mean squat, positive or negative. Billions in revenue means billions in expenses. I am so tired of people referring to “billion dollar companies” like they owe us something extra simply for being big.

]]>
Is viagra over the counter in canada » Cialis Viagra Levitra Pills Without Prescription. http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2008/03/29/this-weeks-infuriating-and-odd-business-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1469 Jodith Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:47:27 +0000 http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2008/03/29/this-weeks-infuriating-and-odd-business-news/#comment-1469 While most insurance policies have this clause, not all of them pursue it equally. I worked for a big software company that was self-insured. We had an employee that was in a bad traffic accident. When the other person's insurance finally paid out, he called about making a reimbursement. The company recognized that he was out of pocket for a lot of things that the health insurance didn't cover and told him not to worry about paying the money back. Just because a company *can* go after that money, doesn't mean that doing so is the right thing to do. Sure, if someone broke their leg and didn't have any long term impairment or lost time off work, then settlements should go towards paying back for health insurance payouts. But in a case like this, it's criminal for a billion dollar company like Wal-Mart to go after someone with a life-time impairment. Even if she'd kept all of that million dollars, it wouldn't be enough to pay for her lifetime care. This is just one of the many reasons that I absolutely refuse to shop at Wal-Mart ever again. They are the very worst example of an uncaring big company. While most insurance policies have this clause, not all of them pursue it equally. I worked for a big software company that was self-insured. We had an employee that was in a bad traffic accident. When the other person’s insurance finally paid out, he called about making a reimbursement. The company recognized that he was out of pocket for a lot of things that the health insurance didn’t cover and told him not to worry about paying the money back.

Just because a company *can* go after that money, doesn’t mean that doing so is the right thing to do. Sure, if someone broke their leg and didn’t have any long term impairment or lost time off work, then settlements should go towards paying back for health insurance payouts. But in a case like this, it’s criminal for a billion dollar company like Wal-Mart to go after someone with a life-time impairment. Even if she’d kept all of that million dollars, it wouldn’t be enough to pay for her lifetime care.

This is just one of the many reasons that I absolutely refuse to shop at Wal-Mart ever again. They are the very worst example of an uncaring big company.

]]>
Is viagra over the counter in canada » Cialis Viagra Levitra Pills Without Prescription. http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2008/03/29/this-weeks-infuriating-and-odd-business-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1468 The BoBo Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:12:55 +0000 http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2008/03/29/this-weeks-infuriating-and-odd-business-news/#comment-1468 Just want to explain the Walmart thing..first..the real crooks are this woman's attorneys. She gets a $1 million settlement from the trucking company and all she gets is $417,000 to put in trust to cover her health care needs? That is 58.3% in legal fees! Next - all insurance companies have a subrogation clause. They pay for the health costs in good faith they will be repaid in case there is a legal settlement that covers healthcare costs. For this woman to keep the money that Walmart paid out would be considered unjust enrichment. Her settlement was supposed to cover ALL healthcare costs..that means even what Walmart paid out on her behalf. She got paid twice if she doesn't return the money. As I said, the real crooks here are her attorneys for taking 58% of her settlement. Just want to explain the Walmart thing..first..the real crooks are this woman’s attorneys. She gets a $1 million settlement from the trucking company and all she gets is $417,000 to put in trust to cover her health care needs? That is 58.3% in legal fees!

Next – all insurance companies have a subrogation clause. They pay for the health costs in good faith they will be repaid in case there is a legal settlement that covers healthcare costs. For this woman to keep the money that Walmart paid out would be considered unjust enrichment. Her settlement was supposed to cover ALL healthcare costs..that means even what Walmart paid out on her behalf. She got paid twice if she doesn’t return the money. As I said, the real crooks here are her attorneys for taking 58% of her settlement.

]]>