I am sure that most Americans are quite excited about the tax rebates that may be coming soon this year due to a major economical stimulus package. What is lesser known about this package is that it will also raise the “conforming” mortgage loan limit from $417,000 to $729,750 in high priced regions until the end of this year. This means that government sponsored enterprises such as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae will be able to purchase loans as large as $729,750, and any loan under this limit will not be a jumbo loan. Basically, people will be able to borrow more money and pay less interest. Who is cheering for this change and why? More importantly, how will you be affected?
Opposing Views on the Issue
What I found interesting is that the National Association of Realtors put out an extremely positive review about this move stating that “NAR’s research found that simply increasing the loan limits for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to $625,000 would permit as many as 300,000 families to enter the housing market, reduce foreclosures by as many as 210,000 and allow as many as 500,000 jumbo loan borrowers to refinance to lower cost loans, saving these people $274 to $411 a month.” On the other hand, this article states that “the director of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), which is the governing body over America’s government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), warned the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee this week about expanding the GSEs’ ability to take on jumbo loans without first having the appropriate stipulations and regulatory structures in place.”
Who should we believe? The glowing report of an association of realtors who have lobbied for the change or the director of a branch of the government that has been tracking housing prices and demographics for more than three decades? I personally believe that the director of OFHEO’s opinion is prudent and logical. With bigger loans, the government sponsored enterprises will be taking on more risk, and if these agencies are destablized by more risky debt then the entire economy could collapse even further.
Best Case Scenario for the Average American
The best case senario I see is that nothing really happens and very few loans get funded under the new limit. These few homeowners will benefit from the lower rate and keep on paying their bills. Hopefully, the paltry number of these homeowners will not affect the housing market in any significant way. The prices of houses continue to decline for a while making homes more affordable and lowering the need for jumbo loans. Basically, the best we can hope for is that nothing changes.
Worst Case Scenario for the Average American
Unfortunately, I think it is possible that this footnote to the stimulus package could have a devastating effect on the current mortgage crisis. First, it may prolong the bubblicious prices in California and the Northeast. Right now I am reading many stories where offers on homes fell through because of the lack of financing. Considering the fact that the average price of shacks in my neighborhood is $700k to $800k, most of these buyers are trying to secure jumbo loans. Once this package goes through, financing will be possible, and the prices on the shacks will not come down as quickly. Even though this higher limit is only in effect for one year, it is possible that more speculators and fraudsters will get into the market and drive prices up even higher. After all, it only took about two years (2004 to 2006) for home prices to double in many parts of California. You may say that this is not a problem for the rest of America, but if Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae become insolvent because of more risky debt, then all Americans will have to pay dearly with mandatory bailouts. Then we can kiss that tax rebate and even more money goodbye.
What I Think Should Happen
I am not an expert, but I firmly believe that what we need is more affordable homes, and not larger loans. So it is probalby best if the limit was left alone and the ridiculous prices fell back down to earth. I think it is ludicrous that the “conforming” loan limit is being lifted more than $300,000 in this package in the blink of an eye considering that it took a span of 23 years for the loan limit to go up from $115k to $417k. Is more debt really good for Americans? What do you think should happen?
Related Posts
How much will the California tax hikes cost you?Plans for Reducing Our Taxes
Obama’s new trillion dollar “stimulus”
Trying to Look on the Bright Side
How Could I Live Without Electricity?
10 comments ↓
Great post… I agree that raising the limit for conforming loans might prop up the market for a little while, but I do wonder how long the effect will last.
If someone can pay back a large loan, then let them have it. Many two-income families can easily afford >$400K loans. It was the sub-prime and interest-only loans that drove up home prices. The market will correct itself. And if it doesn’t, then people who can’t afford homes should be satisfied with renting.
[...] The Dark Side of the Economic Stimulus Package (baglady.dreamhosters.com) [...]
I agree it is bad for America; but hyperinflation is good for big spenders in Congress. The average American does not vote, does not call their Congressman, and does not protest higher taxes or engineered inflation; but the average company does. The businesses know on which side the bread is buttered; the Americans are the ones losing their bread and butter. As to the suggestions many in CA can afford $700,000 homes then I recommend visiting the FHA website and entering tour salary into the form where they tell you how much house you can afford. At $110,000 it is about $300,000; so, maybe some people in CA can afford those homes. I know in San Francisco where I worked the MEDIAN AGI was like $300,000; so, yes, many people there are being paid a kingly some; but, the average programmer pay in Silicon Valley is but about $80,000; so, I don’t think these wealthy folks are anywhere near the norm.
Actually, this is even scarier than you think. From: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=albzArCDnWsI
The bill will allow Fannie and Freddie to raise the limit on purchasing “jumbo” loans to $729,750 from $417,000. Mortgages will be eligible if they were granted between July 2007 and Dec. 31, 2008
This means that banks who ALREADY made loans above the conforming limit back in 2007 will be able to sell these loans to Fannie and Freddie AFTER THE FACT.
This is nothing but a huge bailout for banks.
Bush is a sell-out @hole!
The administration is moving the risk away from the market to quasi-government organizations to lessen the impact on the major lenders. This is not a bailout for borrowers but for lenders who did not properly evaluate their risk. Private, small lenders are going to have a more difficult time properly pricing risk as they are competing with government subsidization. This is a bailout for large lending institutions.
You’re right…raising the jumbo limit $100,000 might be a better place to start; though that isn’t enough to help a lot of Californians. You’re also right that we’ll be in a world of hurt if Freddie and Fannie collapse.
This house of cards is infested with termites!
[...] funny thing is, we still qualify for the economic stimulus tax rebate this year, but it is just enough to cover the taxes we owe so we will come out even. [...]
[...] checks for individuals making less than $75000, and married couples making less than $150000. The most overlooked part of this package was that the jumbo loan limit was raised for mortgages that are purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie [...]
Leave a Comment