<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Mateo Home Sellers in Trouble #5 &#8212; 10/22/07 to 11/04/07</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2007/11/04/san-mateo-home-sellers-in-trouble-5-102207-to-110407/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2007/11/04/san-mateo-home-sellers-in-trouble-5-102207-to-110407/</link>
	<description>Attempts at a Sustainable Lifestyle...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:47:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 1364 Windermere AVE Menlo Park, CA 94025 : San Mateo Home Sellers in Trouble - Bay Area Real Estate Bubble Updates</title>
		<link>http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2007/11/04/san-mateo-home-sellers-in-trouble-5-102207-to-110407/comment-page-1/#comment-1624</link>
		<dc:creator>1364 Windermere AVE Menlo Park, CA 94025 : San Mateo Home Sellers in Trouble - Bay Area Real Estate Bubble Updates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baglady.dreamhosters.com/2007/11/04/san-mateo-home-sellers-in-trouble-5-102207-to-110407/#comment-1624</guid>
		<description>[...] a $260k reduction in just 2 weeks. I had its neighbor 1363 Windermere listed in one of my past San Mateo Home Seller in Trouble posts.  1363 is still selling for $499,000 after six months.  That is probably why they dropped the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a $260k reduction in just 2 weeks. I had its neighbor 1363 Windermere listed in one of my past San Mateo Home Seller in Trouble posts.  1363 is still selling for $499,000 after six months.  That is probably why they dropped the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
